Last week the Supreme Court of the United States was reviewing a 2003 case that dealt with a ban on partial birth abortion. Now of course the main focus of the esteemed judges is legal protocol and procedure. Their purpose is to see that the laws of the land are legal, and if so, executed in a just manner. I know that and not being a lawyer, I only understand the legalese to a certain extent.
After reading some pieces of the court proceedings that were released in the newspapers, I found that there is probably a need for one more person on the court. That person would just be an ordinary man, relatively well educated and smart and a good moral man. Hopefully he would be a Christian that would also be sensitive to the religious freedoms due all people. If this guy were there now, things would be better.
I have only seen what was released to the papers (will be looking for more later), but what I did see was a lot of back and forth technical discussion about the fetus and the difference of killing the fetus when it is totally outside of the womb, as opposed to when the head (and only the head) has not been delivered.
To listen to the pro-abortion side of the argument, you would think they were removing a tumor from the woman. Since they do not assign life to an infant in the womb, I suppose you could call the fetus a tumor - just a hunk of biological cells that needs to come out.
Those technical discussions then lead into the issue about protecting the mother's health during a partial birth abortion. That is absolutely nuts! There is no concern about protecting the health of the mother when the baby must be turned breach. How is that done? The doctor uses both internal and external manipulations to turn the baby feet first. There is no concern for the mother's health when the feet, legs, butt, shoulders and arms are delivered - right up to the neck. At this point one quick tug and the baby would be born. This would take less time than the murder of the baby.
Murder by scissors is the norm. Shove that scissors into the back of the baby's skull - there is a soft spot there. Then open the scissors and twist - kind of mashes up the brain. If that does not seem to work, then pull out the scissors and put a suction tube into the hole. I know a lot of people that could not even due that to a puppy.
I challenge anybody to show me how it is of benefit to a mother to have the head still inside her when her baby is brutalized in this way.
Did you know that your neighbors are the kind of people that would do that to a baby (any Democrats on your block)? Would you send your kids over there to play? The unbelievable destruction of lies. The lie that we do not know when life begins, so we will say it is when the baby is completely born. How do you explain the perfectly formed little feet of a 10-week old in the womb? How do you explain the changes that continue to happen every week? Changes that are not haphazard, but beautifully orchestrated. When a doctor performs surgery on a baby that is still in the womb, have you ever asked yourself why? If the baby is not alive don't operate on it.
We call the baby a fetus, and we call the murder pro-choice. Are the Supreme Court justices of this country so caught up in the legalities that they will support partial birth abortion?
God Bless You if you are seeking Him,
Dennis
Tuesday, November 14, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment